TEAR

i went changed my bag today because the colour was fading and it stained a bit of my uniform.. so i used my bro's heinken crumpler. Except for the label being a spoiler the crumpler was comfortable and looked good. However, it only carried a limited amount of books.. so it looked bulky.

Today I was, like how i was this whole week.. determined to grasp as much as possible during lessons and take down notes like a mad typewriter... as always for physics, it was impossible to catch up with mr ng's speed, because he can't teach that well... mine me but all i'm saying is that he isn't that experienced yet, like he doesn't know how to explain something until the student really gets it and he actually thinks most of us are going to go back and understand his outrageously vague slides which don't accentuate on anything that is going to be out on the paper.. coz all he wrote were general formulas... and what we need to take down is what he writes on the board but he just doesn't care or maybe he doesn't know..

we had physic remedial today and i found the first half useless..because we were just going through a basic electric current question.. not the very complex one you get in exams. At least the second half, when we were revising sec 1 topics and we did energy... i learnt something... i learnt that after finding the initial gravitational potential energy your kinetic energy of the same object at a diff height has to be subtracted by the GPE of the object at that given height.. and all this while i though energy cannot be destroyed or created... but i guess i misunderstood the conversion part... because logically there would be lesser GPE at a diff point and kinetic energy at diff height very.. like at 12 m when the ball is right at the peak... the kinetic energy is 0... and when the ball is 0 m.. the kinetic energy is a hell load...

so physics is going well on the understanding scale but not the applying yet... geography is still alot to memorise..mainly human geography and today's math test was cakewalk for me except one question.. but i hope i didn't make any careless mistakes which i always do..

i'm pretty unsure if i could ace english again.. because it wasn't easy to ace it and isn't easy.. so far i've aced last years fye.. this year term 1 and term 3.. term 2 alot of ppl screwed up and i dropped from 71 to 64 ..and finally back to 71 again now.. i hope the cycle doesnt repeat.. so i'm mainly plotting to win my way by excelling in the essay... but i'm kind of worried.. expository is a no no for me..definitley but if i want to do narrative i havn't practiced! eeek!!!!!

today is going to be quite relaxed for me... im gonna practice an essay, revise julius caesar quotes because i have to get back to acing lit ever since last terms 68..after the term before's 76... 2 marks drop is like..8 percent! can't risk it.. depending alot on my pbq and poem if i screw up essay with a meagre 16/25 .. coz that's what i would get if i don't quote but get my structure in order... and pbq i need 18 or 19.. and poem at least 17...

our hey jude performance is up..check it out...



~KuM!~